Morpho-physiological characteristics and yield attributes of three aromatic rice cultivars in response to 6-BAP

Bikash C Sarker*, Pobitra Rani Minjee, Zannata Uma Nisu, Md Jahidul Islam and Md Jafar Ali

Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh

*Corresponding author: bikash@hstu.ac.bd

Article history: Received: 07.09.2020, Accepted: 10.12.2020, Published Online: 31.12.2020

Cite this article:

Sarker BC, Minjee PR, Nisu ZU, Islam MJ and Ali MJ. 2020. Morpho-physiological characteristics and yield attributes of three aromatic rice cultivars in response to 6-BAP. Intl. J. Agric. Med. Plants. 1(1):1-9.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of 6-Benzyl aminopurine (6-BAP) on growth, physiology, yield and yield attributes of three aromatic rice cultivars cv. Chinigura, Kataribhog and Kalijira. The 6-BAP was applied 0, 20, 40, 60 and 80 ppm at vegetative and pre flowering stages. There was a significant variation among the cultivars and different levels of 6-BAP on both vegetative and harvesting stage on tillers hill-1, leaf length, root depth, panicle length, effective and non-effective tillers hill-1, grain yield, harvesting index, chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll content, and proline content except straw yield and 1000-grain weight. The highest plant height (172.9 cm) was in cv. Chinigura with 60 ppm 6-BAP. The highest panicle length was found in Chinigura with 20 ppm 6-BAP and the lowest was found in Kataribhog with control treatment. The maximum number of grains panicle-1(287) was found in Kataribhog treated with 60 ppm 6-BAP and the minimum number of grains (241.1) in Chinigura under the control. The maximum amount of chlorophyll-a (24.59 mg g-1 FW) was in Chinigura with 60 ppm 6-BAP and the lowest amount (14.87 mg g-1 FW) was recorded in Kataribhog with 20 ppm 6-BAP. The highest amount of total chlorophyll content (25.95 mg g-1 FW) was in Chinigura with 60 ppm 6-BAP while the lowest amount (18.35 mg g-1) was in Kalijira with 80 ppm 6-BAP. The highest proline content (0.353 mg g-1 FW) was recorded in Chinigura with 20 ppm 6-BAP. The Kataribhog produced the highest yield (1.67 t ha-1) treated with 60 ppm 6-BAP. The spraying 60 ppm 6-BAP had the better stimulation on the growth and yield of Kataribhog while 80 ppm for Chinigura. The study infers that 6-BAP enhanced yield of aromatic rice cv. Chinigura which might be an alternative eco-friendly management practices in rice farming business.

Keywords: Aromatic rice, 6-BAP, chlorophyll, foliar spray, growth, yield

REFERENCES

Almela L, Fernandez-Lopez JA and Roca MJ. 2000. High-performance liquid chromatographic screening of chlorophyll derivatives produced during fruit storage. Journal of Chromatography. 870: 483-489.

Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris L. Plant Physiology. 24: 1-15.

Bakhsh I, Awan IU, Baloch MS, Khan EA and Khakwani AA. 2012.  Effect of plant growth regulator (NAA) and irrigation regimes on yield of transplanted coarse rice. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 28(4): 539-544.

Bates LS, Waldren RP and Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39: 205-207.

BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). 2016. The Year Book of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh. Stat. Div. Ministry of Planning.Govt. Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. pp. 96.

Chibu H, Shibayama H, Mitsutomi M and Arima S. 2000.Effects of chitosan application on growth and chitinase activity in several crops.Marine and Highland Bioscience Center Report. 12: 27-35.

Cho MH, No HK and Prinyawiwatkul W. 2008. Chitosan treatments affect growth and selected quality of sunflower sprouts. Journal of Food Science. 73: 570-577.

Das BC and Das TK. 1996. Studies on the response of GA3, NAA and Ethrel on the vegetative growth and yield of pumpkin. Orisssa Journal of Horticulture. 24: 74-78.

Faruq G, Yin YH, Masitah A, Afnierna N, Majid NA, Khalid N and Osman M. 2011. Analysis of aroma and yield components of aromatic rice in Malaysian tropical environment. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 5(11): 1318-1325.

Haider IK. 2018. Appraisal of biofertilizers in rice: To supplement inorganic chemical fertilizer. Rice Science.25: 357–362.

Kabir ME, Kabir MR, Jahan MS and Das GG. 2004. Yield performance of three aromatic fine rice in a coastal medium high land. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 3(5): 561-563.

Khanam N. 2016. Growth, leaf chemical parameters and yield of aromatic rice cv. Chinigura under different levels of 6-BAP. M.S. Thesis. Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.

Lee HS. 1990. Effect of pre-sowing seed treatment with GA3 and IAA on flowering and yield components of groundnut. Korean Journal of Crops Science. 35(1): 1-9.

Liu Y, Chen W, Ding Y, Wang Q, Li G and Wang S. 2012. Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) on the growth of unproductive tillers and the grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7(4): 534-539.

Rahman MS, Sarker BC, Roy B and Habib MA. 2017. Performance of growth and yield attributes of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties influenced by plant growth regulators. Journal of Innovative Agriculture. 4(2): 20-28.

Roxy A. 2016. Effect of different levels of 6-BAP on growth, chemical properties and yield performance of aromatic rice cv. Kataribhog. M.S Thesis. Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.

Sarker BC, Sharmin N, Bhadhury SK and Nisu ZU. 2020.  Effect of naphthalene acetic acid on morpho-physiological and yield traits of three aromatic cultivars. International Journal of Science and Research. 9(1): 519-523.

Sarker BC, Roy B, Fancy R, Rahman W and Jalal S. 2009. Response of root growth and yield of rice (BRRI dhan28) under different irrigation frequencies and plant growth regulator. Journal of Science and Technology. 7: 143-148.

Singh PK, Misra CH and Sharma CL. 2003. Effect of foliar gibberellic acid on seed set and yield contributing character in hybrid rice. New Agriculturist. 14(1/2): 71-74.

Tonucci LH and Von-Elbe JH. 1992. Kinetics of the formation of zinc complexes of chlorophyll derivatives. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 40: 2341-2344.

Yang L, Weiping C, Yanfeng D, Qiangsheng W, Ganghua L and Shaohua W.  2012.  Effect of Gibberellic acid (GA3) and α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) on the growth of unproductive tillers and the grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7(4): 534-539.

Zahir A, Zahir M, Iqbal M, Arshad M and Khalid M. 2007. Effectiveness of IAA, GA3 and Kinetin blended with recycled organic waste for improving growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany. 39(3): 761-768.

frequently asked questions

When is the Article Processing Charges (APC) paid?

Answer: The Article Processing Charges (APC) is paid when an Acceptance of the related paper reaches to the corresponding author.

How much does International Scientist Publications charge for Article Processing?

Answer: Charge standards are in accordance with the national income and vary from countries to counties. You can pay a visit to the website: https:// www.isciencepub.com/

How long does it take for an article from submission to publication?

Answer: From submission to publication, it takes nearly one month: two weeks for article reviewing and acceptance, and another one or two weeks for article publication once the fee is paid.

What are the requirements of an article submitted to International Scientist Publications?

Answer:

  1. The articles you submit must accord with the field of journal you choose.
  2. International Scientist Publications has a policy of “Zero Tolerance on the Plagiarism”.

What’s Open Access?

Answer: Open access (OA) is the normal practice of providing unrestricted access via the internet to peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles. Open Access accelerates research and learning. By reducing the barriers that restrict access to knowledge, Open Access maximizes the opportunity for publications to be read and for authors to be recognized for their contribution in their chosen field and beyond.