Rawnak Ara Noor-E-Ferdous1*and Bikash C Sarker2
1Bangladesh Stevia and Food Industries Limited, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh 2Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Hajee Mohammed Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh
*Corresponding author: firstname.lastname@example.org
Article history: Received: 02.01.2021, Accepted: 16.02.2021, Published: Online: 28.02.2021
To cite this article: Noor-E-Ferdous RA and Sarker BC. 2021. Effects of benzyl aminopurine (BAP) on growth, yield and biochemical characteristics of summer mungbean cultivars. Intl. J. Agric. Med. Plants. 2(1): 21-30.
A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of benzyl aminopurine (BAP) on growth, yield and biochemical characteristicsof three summer mungbean cultivars, cv. Binamoog-5, BARI mung 6 and Binamoog-8 along with four treatments viz., H1-control (without BAP), H2-50 ppm BAP, H3-100 ppm BAP and H4-150 ppm BAPapplied at 15, 30, 45 and 60 days after sowing (DAS). Data were recorded on plant height, number of leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1, dry root weight, root volume, number of root nodule, seed yield, chlorophyll, carotenoid and proline contents. Plant height, number of leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1 and seed yield were statistically different among the cultivars and also significantly influenced by the application of different concentrations of BAP. The highest plant height (68.59 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (10.89), leaf area plant-1 (1677.8 cm2) and seed yield (1.69 t ha-1) were obtained by applying 100 ppm BAP. The interaction effect of cultivars and different concentrations of BAPwere statistically significant on plant height, number of leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1 and seed yield. The highest plant height (71.88 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (12.46), leaf area plant-1 (1863.26 cm2) and seed yield (1.87 t ha-1) were obtained in Binamoog-8 by spraying 100 ppm BAP. Chlorophyll, carotenoid and proline contents were significantly influenced by the application of different concentrations of BAP. The study infers that BAP enhanced growth and yield of summer mungbean cv. Binamoog-8, which might be an alternative eco-friendly management practices.
Keywords: BAP, carotenoid, chlorophyll, growth, mungbean, proline, seed yield.
Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts and polyphenol oxidase on Beta vulgaris L. Plant Physiology. 24: 1-15.
Bakhsh I, Khan HU, Khan MQ and Javaria S. 2011. Effect of naphthalene acetic acid and phosphorus levels on the yield potential of transplanted coarse rice. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 27(2): 161-165.
Bates LS, Waldern RP and Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water studies. Plant and Soil. 39: 205-208.
Chibu H, Shibayama H, Mitsutomi M and Arima S. 2000. Effects of Chitosan application on growth and chitinase activity in several crops. Marine and Highland Bioscience Center Report. 12: 27-35.
Cho MH, No HK and Prinyawiwatkul W. 2008. Chitosan treatments affect growth and selected quality of sunflower sprouts. Journal of Food Science. 73: 570-577.
Das BC and Das TK. 1996. Studies on the response of GA3, NAA and Etherl on the vegetative growth and yield of pumpkin. Orisssa Journal of Horticulture. 24: 74-78.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1988. Land Resource Appraisal of Bangladesh for Agricultural Development. Rep. 2. Agro-ecological regions of Bangladesh. UNDP, FAO, Rome, Italy. p. 116.
Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd Edition). John Wiley and Sons. New York, USA. p. 680.
Husain AJ, Muhmood AG and Alwan AH. 2018. Interactive effect of GA3 and prolineon nutrients status and growth parameters of pea (Pisumsativum L.). Indian Journal of Ecology. 45(1): 201-204.
Ketki G and Thakare RD. 2006. Effect of foliar sprays of nutrients and hormones on morpho physiological parameters of soybean. Journal of Soils and Crops. 16(2): 421-428.
Khan MMA, Gautam C, Mohammad F, Siddiqui MH, Naeem M and Khan MN. 2006. Effect of gibberellic acid spray on performance of tomato. Turkish Journal of Biology. 30: 11-16.
Khanam N. 2016. Growth, leaf chemical parameters and yield of aromatic rice cv. Chinigura under different levels of 6-BAP. M.S. Thesis. Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and TechnologyUniversity, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.
Liu Y, Chen W, Ding Y, Wang Q, Li G and Wang S. 2012. Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) and α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) on the growth of unproductive tillers and the grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7(4): 534-539.
Nickell LG. 1982. Plant Growth Regulators (Agricultural Uses). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, USA. p.173.
Noor F, Hossain F and Ara U. 2017. Effects of gibberellic acid (GA3) on growth and yield parameters of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh Science. 43(1): 49-60.
Noor-E-Ferdous RA, Islam MJ, Nahar NN, Islam MS and Sarker BC. 2012. Interactive effects of liming and naphthalene acetic acid on growth, root nodulation and seed yield of summer mungbean. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal. 15(2): 37-46.
Noor-E-Ferdous RA, Islam MS and Sarker BC. 2020. Influence of gibberellic acid (GA3) on growth, chlorophyll and seed yield of summer mungbean cultivars in Northwest of Bangladesh. International Journal of Agriculture and Medicinal Plants. 1(1): 26-35.
Noor-E-Ferdous RA. 2016. Studies on biochemical, physiological and molecular aspects of summer mungbean under liming with plant growth regulators. PhD Dissertation. Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Hajee Mohammed Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh. pp.169-171.
Porra RJ. 2002. The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equation for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynthesis Research. 73: 149-156.
Rahman MM, Khan ABMMM, Hasan MM, Banu LA and Howlader MHK. 2018. Effect of foliar application of gibberellic acid on different growth contributing characters of mungbean. Progressive Agriculture. 29(3): 233-238.
Raut SG, Vaidya PH, Arsud PB and Aundhakar AV. 2017. Root nodules, yield and quality of soybean (Glycine max L. merrill) as influenced by foliar application of growth regulator. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Photochemistry. 1: 130-132.
Roxy A. 2016. Effect of different levels of 6-BAP on growth, chemical properties and yield performance of aromatic rice cv. Kataribhog. M.S Thesis. Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.
Sanjida T, Sikdar MSI, Islam MS, Rahman MM and Alam MJ. 2019. Response of mungbean growth and yield to GA3 rate and time of application. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 1(2): 28-36.
Sarker BC, Minjee PR, Nisu ZU, Islam MJ and Ali MJ. 2020. Morpho-physiological characteristics and yield attributes of three aromatic rice cultivars in response to 6-BAP. International Journal of Agriculture and Medicinal Plants. 1(1): 1-9.
Sarker BC, Roy B, Nasirullah MT, Islam MA, Sarker BC and Rahmatullah NM. 2009. Root growth, hydraulic conductance and cell wall properties of rice root under interactive effect of growth regulator and limited water. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment. 3(2): 227-230. Wang SG and Dang RF. 1992. Effect of brassionosteroid (BR) on root metabolism in rice. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University. 14(2): 177-181.